Google+: plus.google.com Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.com Name: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Release date: May 2012 Platform(s): PC, PlayStation 3, PlayStation Portable, Nintendo DS, Xbox 360 and Wii Publisher(s): Ubisoft Developer(s): Ubisoft Paris
Look at a BF3 multiplayer, if it looks ANYTHING like real tactics to you you’re a fucking dumbass. And I do good at BF3, but its because I run around like a maniac constantly firing on the move, sprinting around the entire map, and firing from the hip alot. Don’t even fucking preach to me about realism, I have been in a Clan platoon for ARMA 2 Operation Arrowhead, that requires real realistic movement and tactics than BF3 and Ghost Recon Future Soldier, But Ghost Recon’s tactics are closer.
Ha, you ignorant piece of crap. Just because YOU suck at the game and don’t have an ounce of intelligence doesn’t mean the game isn’t realistic. Also, you might want to get glasses if you can’t differentiate BF from CoD.
No, BF3’s singleplayer is jsut as unrealistic as Call of Duty, and the infantry fighting online IS NOWHERE NEAR REALISTIC!!! At least in Ghost Recon in every mode (MP and SP) soldiers move between cover realistically and generally move realistically. In BF3 people constantly sprint and hip shoot everywher LOL “Marine Tactics” its obvious you don’t know what you are talking about so be quiet. What part of BF3 uses “Marine Tactics” you idiot?
No. GRFS uses SEAL infantry tactics. BF3 uses Marine infantry tactics. They both showcase their respective tactics well. BF3 however, uses real tools (weapons, vehicles) while GRFS uses theoretical tools. BF3 also has better graphics, detail, sound, and destruction which do enhance the experience and make it more realistic. Last thing, BF3 is realistic, it just isn’t a simulator though. Most people don’t understand that those two words mean different things.
They are both unrealistic, but GR is more realistic infantry-wise.